Tiger Woods Finally Admits to his Infidelity

Unless you never get on the internet or you’ve been living under a rock, Tiger Woods and his cheating ways have been dominating the headlines and causing page view increases at every site on the internet that features any of his stories. Well, Tiger has finally admitted to his infidelities on his personal website here. It’s about time, you can’t get over this kind of stuff by ignoring it and hoping it’ll go away. Now, everybody who has been obsessed with it, get over it and let’s find some interesting news…

I am deeply aware of the disappointment and hurt that my infidelity has caused to so many people, most of all my wife and children. I want to say again to everyone that I am profoundly sorry and that I ask forgiveness. It may not be possible to repair the damage I’ve done, but I want to do my best to try.

Posted by Jimmy Daniels Posted in: Blogging No Comments » December 2009

Dullard Calls Bloggers Wackos Who Don’t Get Any

When I first read Name and shame offensive bloggers by David Bullard of the Sunday Times, my first reaction was what a dickhead. Obviously this guy has strolled around Technorati, saw some of the crap that is pumped out and assumed, and we all know what happens when we assume, that all blogs are crap and he is lumping us all together. Here are some of my favorite quotes from his “article”.

Admittedly the majority of the bloggers get bored rather quickly and don’t bother to update their sites, but that’s still 70 million people (higher than the population of the UK) who desperately want to be columnists.

Most blog sites are the air guitars of journalism. They’re cobbled together by people who wouldn’t stand a hope in hell of getting a job in journalism, mainly because they have very little to say. It’s rather sad how many people think the tedious minutiae of their lives will be of any interest to anyone else.

I do, however, object to some anonymous, scrofulous nerd pumping meaningless drivel into cyberspace at all hours of the day and night simply because he can’t find a girl to sleep with him. These are the sort of wackos who gun down their fellow students at university. Source: Name and shame offensive bloggers

It’s funny that he thinks we all want to be columnists and work for a newspaper, it couldn’t be farther from the truth for me, why would I want to write a weekly column when I can post something whenever I want, as many times as I want. His regular readers had to wait until Sunday to read his crap, they can read my crap any time.

Now, that last quote was the big one for me, I don’t have to be by my computer to pump out crap into the internet if I don’t want to, hell, I could be getting some while one of my servers is pumping out crap, if that is what I want it to do. “These are the sort of wackos who gun down their fellow students at university”, that statement he needs to regret saying for awhile. Didn’t his spell checker cough when it ran across that sentence? When I saw his picture, my first thought was he was one of those dickheads who thinks he is better than everyone else, so, I read some of his other articles, well, I could only read a couple, as most seemed to try to convey the fact that he has money and does well in life, unless of course, this is part of some joke, or they are referenced somewhere else that makes more sense. I don’t know, but after I was done, respected journalist never entered my mind again.

I read some of the other blogs that were commenting, Vincent Maher says

The second point is that I think we need to demand an apology or a justification for what Bullard has said in his column, and what the Sunday Times has endorsed by publishing it - that we are the type of people who will gun down our fellows at university. If you feel the same way I do, join me in the comments section of this post or join the Facebook group. Source: David Bullard owes South African bloggers an apology

I agree, the paper should make him write an apology, but that’s not going to happen. Why? They either did it just to get some traffic from bloggers, or, they realize they screwed up and are trying to spin it like they were trying to get traffic. If you check out this page, David Bullard and the Blogosphere, you can see they are linking back to blogs that are talking about it, and they said it has generated a huge debate among readers. I don’t think debate is the correct term, as he just slammed bloggers and bloggers are now reacting to it. On that page they have five videos they made, they say they captured his response to the debate, the first one was just him reading some of the blogs and commenting a little, but it cuts him off as he was saying his article worked better than our blogs at getting attention, so that one sucks. The second one he said I got paid for writing mine, you all don’t, then he says I’m off to lunch. I stopped after 2, it was just to painful to download them and watch the little bit of commentary, I’m pretty sure I’m not missing anything.

I don’t know how much more wrong he could be in the second video, I bet that many bloggers, Michael Arrington, Vinny Langham, etc, could buy him and everything he owns over and over, but I really don’t know him, so I’ll just assume it, like he does. Vinny had a few comments on the article himself.

David Bullard : Wake up and smell the coffee - just because bloggers want independence from beaurocratic print houses and leveraging the reach of the Internet, this does not make their work of a lower quality than yours! Life is about choices, and we CHOOSE not to work for print and have editors telling us what and how to write - freedom of speech is grand!! Good luck to you though! Source: Offline Print Journalist calls Bloggers “Wackos who gun down their fellow students”

I probably shouldn’t link to his article, because I really don’t want to send them any more traffic, but I will to make it easy for everyone, but, really, I would just skip reading it, it is just one more dinosaur who will be going away soon.

Posted by Jimmy Daniels Posted in: Annoying Websites, Blogging No Comments » May 2007

Chikita Blog Bash 30 Days of Blogging

30 days of blogging from thirty different expert bloggers, including Chris Pirillo, someone from Gizmodo, some from problogger, someone from the gadgeteer, and many more, 26 more as a matter of fact.

Thirty blogging gurus will be taking over the Chitika Blog to take you into their world of blogging. All brought together in one place to give you the ultimate Expert Month of Blogging experience!

You will get to enjoy tips and explore insights about a variety of unique and interesting topics like, “Dare to be Odd” and “Shopping and Blogging: How to make the marriage work”. Source: April, 2007: Month of Expert Blogging

Here are a couple bits of wisdom I have always found to be true from Chris Pirillo, who is kicking it off today. Good Read.

3. Ignore the echo chamber - once everybody starts talking about it, you’ve already missed your chance for being an early adopter.

4. Stay up late - you’ll get more work done after hours than you ever will during the middle of the day. Source: Ten Secrets of an Earlier Adopter Tech Entrepreneur

This could be pretty good, I am listing the RSS feed below, it will update as they are posted, I think it checks every six hours or so.

Posted by Jimmy Daniels Posted in: Blogging, Online Marketing 1 Comment » April 2007

Pron Prank and Your Image

I have been reading the little episode between the Microsoft RSS Team Blog and Niall Kennedy with some interest, it appears Sean Lyndersay posted an image of Niall’s from Flickr and did not post a link or attribute the photo to anyone. Niall took offense, as he should’ve, and he replaced the image, not with a graphic that said stop stealing my bandwidth or, even better, a Firefox logo, he put up a picture from goatse, a porn image with the Creative Commons logo covering his behind. While, initially funny, it could’ve been handled a lot better than it was.

Kennedy explained via phone that he had offered his ordinary photo (taken at the Gnomedex conference a couple years ago) for use under a Creative Commons license, allowing it to be posted on non-commercial sites, with proper attribution. (Hence the Creative Commons logo censoring out the central part of the pornographic replacement image.) He wasn’t pleased that Microsoft used his photo on a commercial site, without attribution. In addition, he said, the use of the photo violated the Flickr terms of service by not linking back to the site.

“Basically they stole one of my photos and put it on their blog,” Kennedy said. “I decided to make them very aware of that fact.” Source: seattlepi.com

Robert Scoble posted about the incident here, Niall sends Microsoft team a porn message, and he said pretty much the same thing that I thought, he could’ve handled the situation better. Apparently, if I am reading everything correctly, Niall changed the image and then contacted Microsoft, instead of contacting them to ask them what is up first. And he said, someone from the RSS team contacted him and no one there was contacted about the mistake.

Ahh, so someone at Microsoft made a mistake and didn’t correctly use an image from Niall Kennedy’s feed from Flickr (or didn’t pay attention to the Creative Commons license agreement). So, what did Niall do? Did he call up one of his former co-workers at Microsoft and explain that he was pissed and get the problem taken care of nicely and behind closed doors? No.

He replaced the image with a porn image, Todd Bishop at the Seattle PI reports.

I’m sure that gets everyone 16 and under to laugh, but is that really the best way that Niall could have gotten the image taken down? Source: Scobleizer

Nope. And I bet Niall wouldn’t think so if the same thing happened to him, but what do I know. It is kind of funny that someone from Microsoft did this, especially with their big anti-pirating push, and certainly everyone who hates Microsoft has enjoyed this, but it could’ve been handled differently. As Robert was trying to say, stuff on the internet may never go away, and while you may not need anyone or anything else right now, you could find yourself in a worse position one day because of things you do today.

Maybe Niall needed some extra traffic this week…

Posted by Jimmy Daniels Posted in: Blogging, Microsoft, Mistakes No Comments » December 2006

The Web 2.0 Magnifying Glass

Or, how we should be selling the stories.

If you have been blogging or reading blogs for awhile I don’t think you can miss the incestuous nature of blogging, meaning, all blogs link to other blogs which all link back to them, etc, etc. Not saying there is anything wrong with that, but it can make for a concentrated blogosphere, if all you do is read the most popular blogs, you get much of the same stories re-written by each blogger. Not as much for the “A-listers” because they get the good original stuff sent to them, because they drive the most traffic, but “B-listers” and on down much of the time are linking to the same stories, and of course this means everyone is trying to get the most traffic from it, so everyone re-writes the titles to make them sound more and more exciting.

An example is digg.com, one of the secrets to getting dugg to the front page is a good title, and I’ve seen it mentioned several times to use a more sensationalistic title, and similar things happen in the blogosphere, the better titles you have, the more readers you get clicking on your links in their rss readers, or syndicated news on other sites. So, the better title, the more traffic you get, the more traffic you get, the more readers you end up with, etc, etc. So, lots of things are written like they have an urgency, when they really don’t, a lot of things are written like it is a crisis, when it’s really not, kind of like the evening news. You don’t see any good news until the last segment, when they post their local feel good stories, everything else is all style over substance. They make it sound worse than it is to make it sound like they have broken a story, or are on top of things, whatever the reason, and I think it makes everyone, especially the media and bloggers, look like the kid crying wolf because they need attention.

I’ve done it here and I try not to anymore, but sometimes you can’t help it I guess. So, I have been watching and reading and you know what, I don’t think I would miss but a couple blogs if they all went away right now. What does that say about me or about blogging in general, as I check out many different blogs at least once a day. If we all went away, would we be missed?

Posted by Jimmy Daniels Posted in: Blogging, Web 2.0 No Comments » November 2006

Highschool 2.0

Hope Dave, a commenter from TechCrunch, doesn’t mind me borrowing that, that’s what he called this post on TechCrunch by Michael Arrington, Blogger Wars: How Jason Calacanis Gets Even. This kind of reminds me of some YouTube videos I have seen recently, well she said and he said and she said, yadda, yadda, yadda, but I think this is kind of the nature of things sometimes on the Internet. I think everyone says things differently online, everyone is quicker to say something than they would be face to face, you can see it in forums and chat rooms everywhere, and now, even with the “A-listers”.

Nick Denton (pictured left) likes to use his blog Valleywag to take shots at competitors - his most recent hit job was on [tag]Jason Calacanis[/tag] (on right), who founded and then cashed out of the blog network Weblogs, Inc. Denton has always played second fiddle to Jason, never quite achieving the same level of success. Many say this is because he can’t handle it when his writers get more attention than he does, and he finds subtle ways of undermining them. His recent firing and public trashing of writer Nick Douglas certainly lends credibility to this rumor. Source: TechCrunch

It started with this post from Nick Denton, called “Netscape: the Calacanis effect” where he said Jason was just leaving because it was a good time, that he was killing Netscape and that traffic had dropped 70%.

Traffic the week of June 18th, before the Netscape team remade the front page, was 137m page views. The following week, as Netscape decommissioned areas such as news and weather, it declined to 115m. The new front page, a clone of Digg.com, went live on June 29. The first full week after the change, traffic had plummeted further, to 72m page views.

Calacanis has resigned from AOL ostensibly out of loyalty to Miller, and, having founded Silicon Alley Reporter and Weblogs, Inc., he probably also has several startup ideas. Part of the truth, for sure. Valleywag’s more cynical theory: he messed up Netscape.com, and used Miller’s departure as cover. Source: ValleyWag

Jason’s response? To talk up one of Nick’s best bloggers, Gina Trapani from LifeHacker, describing how he had tried every two months for a year to hire her away, but it was never enough. He described how she has grown the site and how he figured the site made a million a year. Obviously, he is trying to cause some friction there, and either get her asking for more money, or other companies offering her more money to jump ship.

The one blogger I wished we had landed at Weblogs, Inc. was Gina Trapani from LifeHacker. I tried every two months for a year I think… no offer was good enough. Very, very frustrating.

Gina is the Peter Rojas/Ryan Block of software… for real. Source: Calacanis.com

I say the hell with the bullshit, lets just talk some bullshit, get away from the attacks and back to some technology stuff. Wonder what’s on techmeme?

Added: Just saw this post on Scripting.com, in which he says Arrington is being challenged be Valleywag, which Nick has already admitted, and that this is a shot because of it.

And Mike, isn’t it good that Nick is focusing on business instead of the salacious stuff? Wouldn’t it be nice to go to the bathroom at a conference and not worry about whether your sanitary habits might appear in Valleywag (true or not). Maybe Mike is protesting because the new Valleywag is getting a little close to TechCrunch? Nahh, couldn’t be.

Note that Nick has more or less said he’s aiming Valleywag at TechCrunch. So when Mike gives Nick grief for challenging a competitor well, Mike ought to be careful about that, because he appears to be doing the same thing. Source: Scripting.com

I guess it doesn’t really matter to me whether all these guys like each other or not, I’ll be reading the good stuff and passing over the rest.

Posted by Jimmy Daniels Posted in: Blogging, TechCrunch, Web 2.0 No Comments » November 2006

Jason Calacanis Leaving AOL

It’s official, [tag]Jason Calacanis[/tag] is leaving AOL, and after reading his post about Jim Miller, I would say it is largely because of his departure as well, although it could just be an easy time to say adios. This appears to be big news in the blogosphere, posts are all over the place about it, Jason, in case you didn’t already know built Weblogs, Inc, into a multi million dollar operation that includes Engadget and many other high traffic blogs, that was bought for about 25 million by AOL. Jason had no agreement that meant he had to stay, so the year he put in at AOL was of his own free will, and leaving now will not cost him a cent, other than his normal salary, I guess.

It is being covered by the NYTimes,

Jason Calacanis, the outspoken blogger and entrepreneur who ran AOL’s Netscape division, resigned on Thursday in the wake of the firing of AOL’s chief executive, Jonathan Miller.

Mr. Calacanis sold his company, Weblogs Inc., a network of blogs, to AOL last year and continued to run it from offices in Santa Monica, Calif. This year he took over Netscape.com, transforming it from a Web portal into a site that lets users vote and comment on news articles. Source: NYTimes

.

It is being covered by Techcrunch, who first broke the story,

We just heard from a source that Jason Calacanis has resigned from AOL. Jason joined AOL just over a year ago when his startup, Weblogs, Inc., was acquired. Most recently, he took over management of Netscape, which relaunched earlier this year as a Digg-like news portal.

I just spoke to Jason briefly on IM - his response as of now is “no comment”. He also spoke to me off the record but that’s, well, off the record. Source: TechCrunch

Jason confirmed it on his blog,

TechCrunch broke the story (less than two hours after I told everyone here), and the New York Times confirmed it with me by phone this afternoon.

I’ve got a lot to say, but I’m thinking that I’ll just talk about it on the final episode of the Gillmor Gang podcast–which we happen to be doing tomorrow (crazy coincidence I know). Source: Jason Calacanis

Valleywag has had several posts about Jason quitting,

Jason Calacanis, the energetic and annoying publishing entrepreneur who once thought he could rise to the top at AOL, is leaving the internet media company. He’s not commenting on the record, but his blog describes Jonathan Miller, ousted CEO of AOL, as his mentor, and Miller’s departure as a sad day. He’s out.

Calacanis first came to notoriety as an internet promoter in the late 1990s as the founder of Silicon Alley Reporter, a print magazine which fulfilled in New York the same role as Silicon Valley’s Red Herring. At the height of the boom, Calacanis brushed off a rumored $30m offer for the title by Time Inc., though accounts of that approach vary. Source: Valleywag

Beet.tv had an article on it, but they covered a different angle,

If AOL is smarting from Jason’s departure, they still have their superstar blogger Peter Rojas, Editor in Chief of Engadget, which is ranked the world’s number one or two blog by Technorati. I saw Peter tonight at the TechCrunch party in New York City. He confirmed he’s staying with AOL.

Peter was a big part of the acquisition of the Calacanis blog network, which I understand netted some $25 million from AOL. Source: Beet.tv

They will certainly miss Jason, he is one of those go getters who doesn’t understand the word fail, much like Thomas Edison, he just finds ways that it hasn’t worked yet, until he hits the right solution. But, since AOL retained Peter Rojas, regarded by some as the number one blogger because of Engadget, they will not loose anything there, although, I am sure he will take some of the Weblogs bloggers with him, you know he will. Wonder what will happen to Netscape now and who will take over for him and what will it mean to all of the Netscape Navigators, the ones they are paying to promote the community?

Posted by Jimmy Daniels Posted in: AOL, Blogging, Netscape, Paid Blogging 2 Comments » November 2006

TechCrunch Burning It Up

You can tell when a website starts getting pretty big and popular, they start becoming the news and in the headlines. TechCrunch.com has been in a lot of headlines and stories recently as well as making lots of headlines with their reviews of Web 2.0 companies and the industry in general.

Lots of articles on TechCrunch recently, here’s one from the Wall Street Journal,

Two years ago, Mr. Arrington, a onetime lawyer and Internet executive was living the life of a surf bum in southern California. Today, the 36-year-old has become one of the most influential people in Silicon Valley. Like a latter-day Henry Blodget, the onetime star Wall Street analyst who helped fuel the late 1990s dot-com frenzy, Mr. Arrington uses his TechCrunch blog to determine the destinies of new start-ups and to fan the flames of the current Internet boom.

Some investors worry Mr. Arrington and his ilk may contribute to an investment bubble that could end badly. In May, Josh Kopelman, an investor with First Round Capital in Philadelphia, warned on his blog that many Web companies today “run a big risk of designing a product/service that is targeted at too small of an audience,” namely subscribers to Mr. Arrington’s TechCrunch blog. (The number of subscribers, then 53,651, has since grown to 133,000, according to the site.) The TechCrunch blog has also spawned its own minipublicity loop, with other bloggers rehashing many of the tidbits Mr. Arrington reports and posting photos from his backyard keg parties. Source: TechCrunch Site Makes Arrington A Power Broker

Lots of blogs, like this one, rehash TechCrunch stories because they report the news before mainstream media, such as the recent Google buying YouTube story. I myself am not interested in all of the Web 2.0 companies he covers, some are interesting, I am mostly interested in industry news, like the YouTube deal, the release of MSN Soapbox, and some of the PayPerPost paid blogging and others. Of course ValleyWag is not a big Arrington supporter, or are they, I can never tell, sometimes you can get more coverage be staging blog fights, here is what they thought in the Michael Arrington dated Miss Denmark, and other things we didn’t want the Wall Street Journal to tell us post.

Michael Arrington posted on his companion blog CrunchNotes about all of the TechCrunch hate going on,

TechCrunch is a new kind of publication. We don’t fit into a neat little box like traditional media, who refrain from financial conflicts of interest with their readers and feel that they are therefore above reproach. They aren’t, but they really, really feel that they are, and look down on blogs and other media as the unwashed masses. Yes, I’m grouping them unfairly, but the really good reporters will all soon be on their own anyway, so this will be completely true eventually.

TechCrunch is different. TechCrunch is all about insider information and conflicts of interest. The only way I get access to the information I do is because these entrepreneurs and venture capitalists are my friends. I genuinely like these people and want them to succeed and they know it and therefore trust me more than they trust traditional press.

I am an active investor, board member and advisory board member with a number of startups. That isn’t going to change. I also write about startups. That isn’t going to change, either. Obviously people like what we write on TechCrunch or they wouldn’t come back. But no one should think TechCrunch is objective or conflict-free. We aren’t. We never have been. We never will be.

All I promise is to give my honest opinion every time I write, regardless of whether there is a conflict of interest or not. Source: Crunchnotes

It’s a good blog and I think most people realize he gets insider information because he’s an insider to start with, if people don’t like it or don’t believe him, then they won’t come back.

Posted by Jimmy Daniels Posted in: Blogging, TechCrunch No Comments » November 2006

100 Million Websites - The Good Old Days

Okay everyone, pat yourselves on the back, Netcraft says we have passed 100 million websites.

Netcraft, an Internet monitoring company that has tracked Web growth since 1995, says a mammoth milestone was reached during the month of October.

“There are now 100 million Web sites with domain names and content on them,” said Netcraft’s Rich Miller.

Netcraft uses the domain name system to identify Web sites, check how many of them are in a particular location, such as what operating system and Web server software they’re running, and then publishes its information in a monthly report.

There were just 18,000 Web sites when Netcraft, based in Bath, England, began keeping track in August of 1995. It took until May of 2004 to reach the 50 million milestone; then only 30 more months to hit 100 million, late in the month of October 2006. Source: CNN

That’s a lot of spam folks, spam blogs, spam sites, scraper sites, crap for crap and more crap.

I remember not even needing a search engine because there weren’t that many sites out there, I remember Mosaic, I remember web 1.0, when it was all just links and pages of text with pictures, I remember Alta Vista, I remember being able to surf around without 3 or 4 programs to protect you, I remember people creating websites to help and not just make money, ahh, the good old days.

From the Netcraft site,

There are now more than 100 million web sites on the Internet, which gained 3.5 million sites last month to continue the dynamic growth seen throughout 2006. In the November 2006 survey we received responses from 101,435,253 sites, up from 97.9 million sites last month.

The 100 million site milestone caps an extraordinary year in which the Internet has already added 27.4 million sites, easily topping the previous full-year growth record of 17 million from 2005. The Internet has doubled in size since May 2004, when the survey hit 50 million. Source: Netcraft

Lots and lots of spam. I get so much blog link spam it is incredible, it all gets blacklisted, so eventually I will end up deleting comments by someone with a valid comment, so let me apologize in advance.

Posted by Jimmy Daniels Posted in: Blogging No Comments » November 2006

More Uproar Over Paid Blogging

I know at least two full time bloggers who are really upset with PayPerPost and the new model they are promoting, getting paid for specific blog posts about products in their inventory. One is Jim Kukral from Revenews.com, an online revenue and online publishing blog I post at, he has posted on the subject several times, one tonight apparently Saying they are going to fail, another here comparing it to Cremaid, what a sucky name, an interview with the founder of PayPerPost here, you get the idea.

The second is Michael Arrington from TechCrunch, whose latest post is PayPerPost Is Now Officially Absurd, really takes there latest attempt to task,

At PayPerPost, bloggers are offered cash to write about products. Disclosure is optional, and often the bloggers are required to only express positive comments.

Don’t look for PayPerPost to require blogger disclosure anytime soon. Instead, they are creating a distraction, designed to keep the buzz about PayPerPost going strong, as well as to move people’s attention away from the core issue of blogger disclosure of product shilling.

In a move reminiscent of big tobacco funding tobacco research, PayPerPost is announcing a new initiative on Monday called DisclosurePolicy, which “provides policy creation tools, best practices and forums for discussing the delicate balance between content creator freedoms and audience transparency expectations.”

Now, the Disclosure Policy site opened a campaign on PayPerPost, so they actually are paying bloggers 10 bucks to post a disclosure policy. And that just doesn’t feel right. Would’ve been more convincing to me had they just required one and not paid for it. I agree that some aspects of their business model are suspect, allowing some advertisers to require positive posts is their first big mistake, and probably why they don’t require full disclosure on each post, who would believe any of the posts if they new they had to be positive? And, that is, of course, their second big mistake, not making them disclose that it is an advertisement on each post. But, bloggers are risking their own reputations, so I guess they know what’s best for them.

Blurring the lines in this way - facilitating the pollution of the blogosphere while creating an illusion of doing something good for the public, is a good business move for PayPerPost. But it is a terrible development for the blogosphere and public trust. I hope that very few bloggers are suckered into going along with this.

In their defense, they look at each post before hand, so they have final approval, and it would be silly to risk letting anyone put out any spammy posts, or other crap, so, I don’t think there will be a pollution of the blogosphere. Ultimately, it will be up to [tag]PayPerPost.com[/tag] what people think of them, if they only allow high quality posts, they may be able to do something. I can see some potential in using a campaign to cause a stir, or to promote something that is not bought and sold, drive traffic to new websites, but reviews may not be the best use of this advertising program. Or, as Wayne said in the comments at Revenews.com, “I remain open minded. I think I’ll start a “Pay For Flame”. Successfully get a red flaming blog battle going and you get double payouts, etc. PPE, Pay-Per-Escalation”. Surely there are some webmasters who see good links with strong keyword terms, cheap.

Read the TechCrunch post, one of the venture capitalists who invested in [tag]PayPerPost[/tag] posted there along with over 160 other comments. Some serious discussion is good for the soul.

Posted by Jimmy Daniels Posted in: Blogging, Paid Blogging 1 Comment » October 2006

« Previous Entries